2013

Welch v. City of Albuquerque

TERYSA M. WELCH, Plaintiff,
v.
CITY OF ALBUQUERQUE, a New Mexico Municipality; RAYMOND SCHULTZ, ELIZABETH PAIZ, WILLIAM ROSEMAN, JOSEPH HUDSON, DAVID HUBBARD, ROBERT SMITH, CECIL KNOX, J.R. POTTER, KEVIN GAGNE, SUE NEAL, JOHN DOES I-V, Individually And as agents and employees of the City of Albuquerque, Defendants.

WIGGINS, WILLIAMS & WIGGINS, P.C. Counsel for Defendants Theresa E. Gheen, Esq.

ROBERT R. COOPER LAW FIRM, P.C. Counsel for Plaintiff Ryan J. Villa, Esq.

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS TO MAGISTRATE'S ORDER STAYING CASE UNTIL QUALIFIED IMMUNITY RESOLVED

THIS MATTER came before the Court upon Defendants Raymond Schultz, William Roseman, Cecil Knox, David Hubbard, Robert Smith, J.R. Potter, Kevin Gagne, Elizabeth Paiz, Joseph Hudson, Sue Neal, and the City of Albuquerque (collectively, "Defendants") Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Response to Plaintiff's Objections to Magistrate Judge's Order Staying Case Until Qualified Immunity Resolved ("Motion"). [Doc No. 138] Plaintiff had filed her Objections to Magistrate Judge's Order Staying Case Until Qualified Immunity Resolved ("Objections") [Doc. No. 137] pursuant to Federal Rule of Procedure 72(a) which does not address whether filing a response is permitted.

The Court FINDS that the Motion is well taken and IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants are granted leave to file their response to Plaintiff's Objections to Magistrate Judge's Order Staying Case Until Qualified Immunity Resolved.

http://nm.findacase.com/research/wfrmDocViewer.aspx/xq/fac.20131213_0002296.DNM.htm/qx